28 February DO YOU REALLY NEED A CORPORATE GOVERNANCE FRAMEWORK®? February 28, 2017 Corporate Governance Framework®, General By Jene’ Palmer and reviewed by Terrance M. Booysen We know that both local and international organisations are continuously having to adapt to operate in uncertain business environments. Locally, the release of the Preferential Procurement Regulations 2017, which places stronger emphasis on ‘radical transformation’, against the backdrop of persisting low economic growth rates are only some of the elements giving rise to further uncertainty. Internationally, the business and regulatory implications of the election of President Donald Trump and the vote in favour of Brexit and how these events will impact on local markets and businesses, is still unfolding. It therefore comes as no surprise that recent governance, risk and compliance (‘GRC’) surveys all indicate an increasing need to improve risk oversight and to balance opportunity management with risk management. The challenge lies in being able to achieve these objectives! More often than not, organisations are structured and managed as silos. It therefore follows that risk and opportunity management is likely to also be conducted as siloed activities. In addition, audit and risk committees have focused strongly on the management of traditional risks such as that of financial risks and regulatory risks. In fact, Grant Thornton’s GRC 2016 survey confirms that most of an organisation’s GRC investment is applied to these traditional risks. Strategic and operational risks have been afforded a lower priority despite their impact on the sustainability of an organisation. For organisations to succeed in these turbulent times, it is imperative that risk and opportunity management be inculcated into the culture of the organisation and that risk and opportunity management systems, processes and analytical information be integrated across the organisation. This can be achieved by implementing a Corporate Governance Framework®. “The board should approve a group governance framework that articulates and gives effect to its direction on relationships and the exercise of authority across the group” King IV™ Report on Corporate Governance for South Africa for 2016 * The board is responsible for setting the ‘tone at the top’ and for ensuring that board members and senior executives alike understand their roles and responsibilities in the organisation – particularly as they pertain to enterprise wide risk and opportunity management. The Corporate Governance Framework® provides the board and senior executives a singular schematic view of the risk and opportunity management areas (i.e. the governance components) which are important to the organisation. In addition, the framework provides a high-level view -- on a simple red, amber, green (‘RAG’) methodology -- of the extent to which all these governance components are being efficiently and effectively monitored and controlled. The likelihood of important non-traditional risk areas being overlooked is therefore significantly reduced. A properly implemented Corporate Governance Framework® also facilitates transparency and information sharing and as such very quickly identifies how different governance components are interdependent and integrated – thereby equipping the board and its senior executives with the knowledge required to take the necessary corrective action to mitigate risk and exploit opportunities as they arise across the organisation. The Corporate Governance Framework® is not simply an organisational organogram or authority matrix. “The governing body assumes responsibility for providing the direction for how each governance area should be approached, addressed and conducted. Thisisfollowedbyformulation of policy in the form of frameworks, standards and plans by management to be approved by the governing body. The governing body oversees and monitors implementation and execution by management, and finally ensures that there is accountability for the performance in respect of each of these governance areas through reporting and disclosure” King IV™ Report on Corporate Governance for South Africa for 2016 * Fast and effective decision-making is required for organisations to navigate their way through these tough socio-economic times. GRC studies confirm that those organisations who have adopted good governance practices and who manage general and specific risks well, produce better operational results. The Corporate Governance Framework® enables access to transparent and timeous information and highlights those governance components which need to be prioritised. Investment and resource allocation decisions can therefore be enhanced. Nearly all organisations conduct business with third parties, but very few organisations actually manage third party risk (as part of their operational risk). Organisations should be assessing the impact of third party risk on their own supply chain – and ultimately on the sustainability of their own organisations. Not only will a Corporate Governance Framework® facilitate the identification of such risk, but by insisting that third parties also implement such a framework and demonstrate their application of good governance practices, organisations will facilitate the evaluation of the bearing of third party risk on their own operational risk profile. Forearmed is forewarned and the appropriate steps can then be taken to mitigate the identified risk. The Code for Responsible Investing in South Africa (‘CRISA’) requires institutional investors to incorporate sustainability considerations into their investment decisions and processes. The increased level of transparency which accompanies good corporate governance stimulates perceived investor confidence. Stronger operational results and the improved ability to make decisions transforms into increased access to capital and debt financing – enabling the organisation to leverage its opportunities to the fullest. So, instead of asking: “Do we really need a Corporate Governance Framework®”, perhaps the conversation should centre on how to implement such a framework. In a constantly changing world, high performers will be differentiated by their ability to effectively and efficiently manage GRC. Expectedly, in developing a Corporate Governance Framework®, it is important to ensure that this framework is tailored to suit the organisation’s business and its environment. There is no one-size-fits all. The development of the framework is a continuous process which matures as the organisation and its leadership evolves. * The Institute of Directors in Southern Africa (‘IoDSA’) owns the intellectual property of King IV™ and the King IV™ report can be accessed at no cost at: http://www.iodsa.co.za/?page=AboutKingIV) Related Articles TANGIBLE BENEFITS OF A CORPORATE GOVERNANCE FRAMEWORK® Article by Jene’ Palmer Forward-thinking organisations have realised that corporate governance does not merely fall into the portfolio of the Company Secretary. Indeed, the draft King IV Report on Corporate Governance for South Africa 2016 (‘King IV’), describes corporate governance as “the exercise of ethical and effective leadership by the governing body” of an organisation. Why then is corporate governance still viewed by many organisations as a process which increases bureaucracy and drives a ‘tick box’ exercise? Perhaps the explanation lies in not understanding and appreciating the value which can be unlocked by implementing a purpose-built Corporate Governance Framework® which is tailored to the organisation. Empirical research supports the fact that good corporate governance translates into tangible and sustainable benefits for the organisation. Some of these benefits are set out below. CORPORATE GOVERNANCE: STAGNATION, SCRUTINY AND THE URGENT NEED FOR DIGITISATION (2025-03-10) Another governance crisis waiting to happen In recent years, corporate governance has become a hot topic following scandals like Steinhoff, Tongaat Hulett and many others, but despite increased attention, significant and material progress in improving governance practices across organisations remains alarmingly scarce. Governance frameworks in most organisations continue to be outdated, underdeveloped, and often untested and this leads to recurrent corporate failures and directors being increasingly exposed to personal liability. Furthermore, the lack of scrutiny and digitised tools to assess governance maturity and performance means that there is no real accountability until it is too late and governance failures are, therefore, likely to persist. BOARDS THAT CREATE VALUE: CORPORATE GOVERNANCE FRAMEWORK® By Jene’ Palmer and reviewed by Terrance M. Booysen It has been painful to watch the likes of Lance Armstrong, Mike Tyson and Hansie Cronje sabotage their futures through poor decision-making. Similarly, many organisations and their boards have failed to demonstrate strong and responsible leadership qualities to motivate and drive their organisations to success. Awareness, decisiveness and accountability are some of the business leadership qualities required to achieve remarkable performances. The ‘buck’ stops with the board of directors and it is the board of directors who are ultimately held accountable for the success of the organisation. However, with the business landscape changing at an accelerating rate, risk management and decisive decision-making are becoming more challenging and business failures more prominent. A recent Harvard Business Review reports the failure rate for mergers and acquisitions to be between 70% and 90%. According to the United States Small Business Administration, only 44% of new businesses are still in existence after four years. Against this backdrop, how does a board create a sustainable organisation in what are clearly turbulent times? USING THE CORPORATE GOVERNANCE FRAMEWORK® IN TIMES OF GREAT UNCERTAINTY (2021-11-17) Whilst most corporations across the world have had to make drastic changes to their business operations as a result of the Covid19 pandemic, many business leaders believe that the disruptions caused by the pandemic have inadvertently introduced more advantages than disadvantages. However, are the odds actually stacked against the organisation? DIRECTORS’ SENTIMENT INDEX™ REPORT: 5TH EDITION – CGF’S OBSERVATIONS FROM A GOVERNANCE PERSPECTIVE (2020-11-12) A review of the Institute of Directors in South Africa (‘IoDSA’)’s recently released report for 2020 raises some interesting observations from a governance perspective. It should be noted that the study was concluded prior to the nation-wide lockdown and national state of disaster due to the Corona virus (‘Covid-19’) pandemic. It is likely that the sentiments expressed by respondents may have been significantly more pessimistic had the study been concluded in the second half of 2020. THE CORPORATE GOVERNANCE FRAMEWORK® - AN ALTERNATIVE TO WHISTLEBLOWING (2023-07-21) Whistleblowing can be a courageous act, but it is not always the best option for everyone due to potential risks and consequences. It is also true that by the time any whistleblowing mechanisms are used, the damage has already been done to the organisation and its stakeholders. This begs the question then: what is the alternative? Comments are closed.