19 June THE COMPANY SECRETARY: FROM COMPANY ADMINISTRATOR TO GOVERNANCE LEADER (2018-06-19) June 19, 2018 Board of Directors, General, The Company Secretary company secretary, board of directors, role of company secretary By Terrance M. Booysen (Director: CGF) and peer reviewed by Lucien Caron (Lead Independent Consultant: CGF) The role of a company secretary is broad and onerous to say the least and, if this post is not occupied by a competent person who has the appropriate knowledge and skills; the consequences can be the cause of significant organisational friction. The requirements and reporting lines of the position -- by their very nature -- give rise to potential conflict situations, and it is for this reason in particular, that the person appointed to the position must have the necessary maturity, experience and independence to properly carry out their duties and responsibilities, while being objective, impartial and independent. The role of company secretary has evolved well beyond a mere minute-taker The role of a company secretary within a modern organisation comprises two main elements. The first element requires the company secretary to ensure the smooth running of the board’s functions, and this covers the more “traditional” secretariat role, such as attending board, board committee, shareholder and trustee meetings, and preparing the relevant documentation before and after these meetings. This first element is what gives the company secretary rather unique insights into the organisation, which not many other employees will have at their respective levels within the organisation. Not only is the company secretary intimately aware of what will be discussed at the meetings of the board and other top-level committees (this being as a result that they are required to prepare the respective agendas and relevant documentation to be tabled at the meetings which is typically done in consultation with the Chairman of the board), but they will also have access to the same sensitive board pack information provided to the board. The company secretary will also then be present at the meeting, where the contents of certain reports, proposals and strategies will be discussed, and will be required -- among other things -- to minute the meeting and follow up on the outcomes of the discussions and actions proposed at the meetings. “In recent years the company secretary has become an important and powerful individual within the company. This role is enforced by the [Companies] Act [2008] and King IV™.” Source: Duties of Directors Deloitte (2017) With these unusually deep insights into the workings of the organisation’s board, it is no wonder that the company secretary is often referred to as the “keeper of secrets”. In fact, the word “secretary” comes from the Latin word sēcrētus which means something that is “confided only to a few” or “secret”. The second element of the company secretary’s role involves ensuring -- from a good governance point of view -- that directors are adequately informed and protected in the heightened regulatory environment in which modern organisations operate…and this is no mean feat. Staying ahead and being adequately informed In considering the concept of a board being kept ‘adequately informed’ by a company secretary; the latter will themselves be required to first have a thorough grasp of relevant legislation, regulation and other governance instruments, structures and mechanisms prior to them passing such information to the board. Indeed, a competent company secretary must be able to discern various levels of information which is required to be ‘filtered’ across various board and executive levels. They also need to be up-to-date on relevant industry trends and knowledge before passing such information to the board who is ultimately accountable to the organisation’s stakeholders for the organisation’s long-term success. In addition to providing the board with this type of important information, the company secretary is also responsible for proactively ensuring that the organisation’s legal and regulatory governance structures and operations are in place, and they are also typically required to ensure that there are proper communication channels in place to communicate the necessary information to the organisation’s stakeholders. Given the second element of the company secretary’s massive tasks of keeping the board, including the organisation’s executive management and key stakeholders informed of a wide array of important matters (and the associated actions), a more systematic and co-ordinated approach is generally used by experienced company secretaries to ensure that they address all of the pertinent and often critical issues. To assist company secretaries -- and by association the members of the board and executive -- a digitised Corporate Governance Framework® significantly changes the nature of their role within the organisation. With the assistance of such a framework, the company secretary is able, at any point in time, to know, assess and report on the status of any one of the organisation’s governance elements (i.e. operational performance, key legislation, regulation, key policies, integrated reporting, IT governance and business continuity management, to name a few of the thirty-two governance elements found in most organisations). “The role the Company Secretary play in managing legal entity governance has changed dramatically in recent years and perhaps a more befitting title for the role is now Governance Director or Leader. In today’s regulatory environment, the Company Secretary plays a more strategic enabling role, making sure directors are protected and proactively ensuring legal and regulatory governance compliance, throughout a group.” Source: Report - Subsidiary governance: An unappreciated risk (April 2013) PricewaterhouseCoopers Since the company secretary is usually swamped with back-to-back meetings and large volumes of administrative work against tight time-deadlines, the quasi-real time information and evidence extracted from a digitised Corporate Governance Framework® provides a seamless filter of critical information. This allows the company secretary to timeously pass critical and relevant information on directly to the board so that the board, together with the organisation’s executives, can properly manage the organisation’s current and potential risks on an informed and proactive basis. With this in mind, it’s no wonder that the role of the company secretary has changed dramatically in recent years such where it is increasingly managing the organisation’s governance, often acting as the organisation’s custodian in these matters and therefore being regarded as the most senior administrative officer of the organisation. If the old adage “knowledge is power” holds true; the company secretary is indeed a very powerful person within the organisation and they hold a critical post. With the combination of their insights into the meetings of the board, coupled with their understanding of the relevant governance framework in which the organisation operates -- as well as their intimate knowledge of the actual operations of the organisation -- there are few that rival this position. As proposed in Principle 10 of the King IV Code on Corporate Governance for South Africa, 2016™ (King IV™), the company secretary must report functionally to the board, but administratively to a designated member of the executive management. In practice, this “designated member” is usually the organisation’s Chief Executive Officer or Chief Financial Officer (who will not necessarily be members of the organisation’s board), and as such it becomes clear how an easily swayed or impressionable company secretary may find it extremely difficult to be the “keeper of the board’s secrets”. What should organisations look for in their company secretary? While the position of company secretary has always been important within an organisation, especially from an administrative point of view, it is clear that the role’s scope of responsibility has grown over the years from ‘efficient administrator’ to ‘governance leader’. Since the function and role of a company secretary hold such importance within an organisation and since the person will play a pivotal role in assisting and supporting the board at both an administrative and guidance level, their appointment should be carried out with great circumspection. A company secretary should have the necessary experience, maturity and gravitas to have the ear of the Chairman of the board and should be someone who is confident in their knowledge, astute and unintimidated by improper influences. “The company secretary must also act as the central source of guidance and advice to the board and must provide the board…with appropriate guidance on how their responsibilities may optimally be discharged in the best interests of the company.” Source: Corporate Governance - R Naidoo (2016) While the requirement that the company secretary pass a “fit and proper” test -- similar to that required of the directors of an organisation -- is not necessarily stated in legislation or contained in the latest corporate governance codes, it is most certainly implied by the caliber of person required to fill the position. Why should all organisations appoint a company secretary? In most countries, public and state-owned organisations are mandated to appoint a company secretary, while private organisations are not legally required to do so. That being said, the role and responsibilities of a company secretary are so essential to the proper running of an organisation, both at an administrative and governance level, that any private organisation would be hard-pressed to operate efficiently and sustainably without one. The importance of the role of company secretary, as well as the provisions of modern corporate governance codes and indeed best practice, require that an organisation’s board should appoint such a person in order to obtain independent and professional guidance on corporate governance matters. ENDS Words:1,402 For further information contact: CGF Research Institute (Pty) Ltd Terrance M. Booysen (Chief Executive Officer) Tel: +27 (0)11 476 8264 | Cell: +27 (0)82 373 2249 E-mail: [email protected] Website: www.cgfresearch.co.za CGF Research Institute (Pty) Ltd Lucien Caron (Lead Independent Consultant) Tel: +27 (0)11476 8264 | Cell: +27 (0)82 787 7010 E-mail: [email protected] Follow CGF on Twitter: @CGFResearch Click below to read more... Attached Files 20180619-The-Company-Secretary-From-company-administrator-to-governance-leader-2.pdf 167.41 KB Related Articles TANGIBLE BENEFITS OF A CORPORATE GOVERNANCE FRAMEWORK® Article by Jene’ Palmer Forward-thinking organisations have realised that corporate governance does not merely fall into the portfolio of the Company Secretary. Indeed, the draft King IV Report on Corporate Governance for South Africa 2016 (‘King IV’), describes corporate governance as “the exercise of ethical and effective leadership by the governing body” of an organisation. Why then is corporate governance still viewed by many organisations as a process which increases bureaucracy and drives a ‘tick box’ exercise? Perhaps the explanation lies in not understanding and appreciating the value which can be unlocked by implementing a purpose-built Corporate Governance Framework® which is tailored to the organisation. Empirical research supports the fact that good corporate governance translates into tangible and sustainable benefits for the organisation. Some of these benefits are set out below. DIGITISING GOVERNANCE: HOW PROFESSIONAL BODIES, TECHNOLOGY AND LEADERSHIP CAN DRIVE SOUTH AFRICA’S RECOVERY (2025-02-04) In the face of escalating governance challenges in South Africa’s State-Owned Enterprises (SOEs) which include Eskom, Denel, Transnet, PRASA and SABC to mention a few, there has never been a greater need for urgent reform, and it’s critical that we begin to take appropriate action. Time and again, we hear leaders admit, “We know we have a governance problem, but we do not know how to fix it, or where to start.” DIRECTORS’ SENTIMENT INDEX™ REPORT: 5TH EDITION – CGF’S OBSERVATIONS FROM A GOVERNANCE PERSPECTIVE (2020-11-12) A review of the Institute of Directors in South Africa (‘IoDSA’)’s recently released report for 2020 raises some interesting observations from a governance perspective. It should be noted that the study was concluded prior to the nation-wide lockdown and national state of disaster due to the Corona virus (‘Covid-19’) pandemic. It is likely that the sentiments expressed by respondents may have been significantly more pessimistic had the study been concluded in the second half of 2020. MEASURING THE ORGANISATION’S GOVERNANCE EFFORTS (2022-04-21) For many years corporate governance has been a sensitive topic for many boardrooms. In reality, despite the writing of the various codes of corporate governance, the business and state environments remain littered with examples of failed governance. Given that the South African business landscape still finds itself in deep trouble, one may argue that the introduction of the latest King IV™ Report on Corporate Governance for South Africa 2016 and its outcomes-based reporting has still not had the desired impact in driving governance change. SOUTH AFRICA’S PATH TO DIGITAL GOVERNANCE: A GOVERNANCE FRAMEWORK FOR CHANGE IN THE GLOBAL SOUTH (2025-01-27) Confronting the challenges at home South Africa finds itself at a critical crossroads, grappling with deep-rooted governance challenges, corruption, and a lack of accountability in its state entities. Notwithstanding these frustrating challenges there is an opportunity for President Ramaphosa to leverage South Africa’s G20 presidency to demonstrate how governance reform -- driven by digital tools -- can create a more inclusive, accountable, and efficient system of directing and controlling organisations - especially within state managed entities. A DIGITISED GOVERNANCE FRAMEWORK SUPPORTS A DECENTRALISED AUTONOMOUS ORGANISATION (DAO) (2024-04-10) Traditional governance reporting With the age of digitalisation firmly entrenched -- and a global economy on the cusp of the Fifth Industrial Revolution -- forward-thinking organisations worldwide have embraced the notion of equipping their workforce for greater meaning and purpose. Considering how organisations have the technological means to streamline their business processes, which often has negative implications upon mundane and/or highly repetitive job functions, these organisations understand the importance of a more ‘human-centered’ approach to conducting their business which is fundamental to their future and sustainability. Given the focus on human empowerment -- being one of the 6-capitals cited by the King Report IV™ for Corporate Governance -- the importance of collective governance assessments made by a much broader stakeholder group of the organisation could not be more important. Comments are closed.